Playing with light. That’s what we’re doing this week for Jude’s photo assignment. I took each of my shots three times: as a simple automatic shot, in high key and in low key mode.
It’s probably me and the shots I chose, but in each case, working in high key did these subjects no favours, and simply made them look bleached and lifeless. Low key however did add some drama.
I looked at my neighbour’s roses in the morning, took a walk at noon, and enjoyed the first of the petunias to show its face in the evening.
Here’s a little quiz. Each of these shots is taken in high key, low key, automatic, or in toy – pinhole – mode. But which one? Have a look at the gallery, before bringing up the shot full size to reveal the answer.
You are altogether much too clever for me but I enjoyed looking at it all.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Don’t do yourself down Susan! I couldn’t manage without all your off-the-beaten-track Tourist Information!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting exercise, I can see this is going to evolve further.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who knows …
LikeLike
How interesting. High key definitely loses out all round in these shots but I do like the low key shots very much. Not that I understand the technical bits though you have piqued my interest. My universal approach is to use my point and shoot or phone on automatic and edit etc. afterwards. Part of me would like to learn how to use a ‘proper’ camera. Sadly I lack the patience so I’ll enjoy your shots (and Jude’s and others) vicariously instead 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I rarely uses anything but automatic, and I certainly don’t twiddle knobs. But I do have the possibility to switch to various things like low and high key, expressive, impressive etc,, as well as setting specifically for portraits, landscape, water, night etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
High key in post processing is rarely successful unless the subject, background lighting etc are nearly there anyway, then it will tweak it a bit further…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, I see. Yes, I know these weren’t good examples, but I couldn’t quite see going through my archives for better ones.
LikeLike
High key very much depends on the photo. It needs a blank background to show off a subject properly. Portraits work well. Low key is much more usable. The point really is to demonstrate how lighting affects what we see. I don’t understand the toy effect, and is the shrub pinhole!? I have never used that one either. Thank you for your examples, the rose and peony are delightful 😊
LikeLiked by 2 people
My manual explains that ‘toy’ in this context very oddly means pinhole. It works better in some contexts than others. An I realise that I wasn’t giving high key a fair crack of the whip here. It has its uses, but I was devoid of suitable inspiration.
LikeLike
This was high key – to some extent
https://traveltalk.me.uk/2015/02/27/black-and-white-5-day-challenge-4/
LikeLike
Awesome shots, Margaret! And hope you’re doing good!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fine thanks. Windy today! Hope all’s well with you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know what high key and low key mode are, but I can see what they do. Are these special settings on your camera?
LikeLike
Lovely in any light! 💐
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’re lucky to have access to such a lovely garden.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting to see the differences. I think I spot your breakfast window in the photo with the building at the back of the garden?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh clever you! What a super-sleuth!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those window frames are very distinctive and handsome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
oh you have had a proper play with the high and low keys . . .I decided it was a bit beyond me last week as had such an impossibly busy week work wise, and then had a neighbour emergency which took up the rest of my time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hope all’s OK now?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fortunately yes, but was a scary 24hrs for her and her family. None of the family live near so it was me assisting with paramedics and packing a hospital bag. Social distancing went out the window! Still both she and I have not been out so we concluded it was probably fine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fingers crossed. Well done you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Think all of us would do it . . .felt like I was passing on the kindness all my neighbours have shown my mum 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Paying back, paying forward … all good.
LikeLike
🤗
LikeLike
A fun exercise Margaret. One never knows which approach will work best until we try!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup. As Beckett says: ‘Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better’.
LikeLike
Ooh that’s a new quote for me Margaret. I love it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too! I’m good at ‘failing better’.
LikeLike
That’s interesting to see with your different settings shown altogether as it has totally confirmed my view that I can save an underexposed photo, but I haven’t yet managed to pull back an overexposed one. It must be something technical with digital cameras, but it a practical lesson learnt as you have shown – overexposure loses all the colour pixels to whites, possibly???
LikeLiked by 1 person
I imagine so, but you’re the techie round here. I can do little more than point and shoot!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You put me to shame – all I seem to do these days is point and shoot. Must try harder
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sharon – that’s all do too. Honest.
LikeLike